Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Painter Pablo Picasso. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Painter Pablo Picasso. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Portrait of Ambroise Vollard, Picasso (1910) picasso





Artist: Pablo Picasso (1881-1973) was revolutionising art when he painted this cubist portrait in 1910. Cubism was an all-out assault on habits not only of painting but of seeing. In their revolution between 1908 and the first world war, Picasso and Georges Braque, as if to provide the viewer with some sort of anchor, stuck to traditional genres - the still-life and the portrait. By starting with the assumptions of pictorial content that a portrait brings, cubist painting is all the better able to subvert them.

However, this is not a mockery of portraiture; Picasso would have said that it is a more truthful portrait. The mystery of cubist portraiture, its depiction of the self as intangible, indescribable, revives in modern art the seriousness of Rembrandt.

Subject: Ambroise Vollard (1867-1939) was one of the great art dealers of the 20th century. He championed Cézanne, Van Gogh, Renoir, Gauguin and Rousseau. He promoted Picasso's blue and rose periods, but he was careful about cubism. When Picasso later returned to a figuration informed by cubist richness and surrealist eroticism, they collaborated on one of Picasso's greatest achievements: his lubricious, mytho-erotic Vollard Suite, 100 engraved plates completed in 1937, culminating in emotional portraits of Vollard, who was to die two years later in a car crash.

Distinguishing features: His downcast eyes, apparently closed, the massive explosion of his bald head, multiplying itself up the painting like an egg being broken open, his bulbous nose and the dark triangle of his beard are the first things the eye latches on to. They are recognisable. At least that's the way your mind, through habit, composes the details into information.

But what head? What beard? Above Vollard's eyes is a broken architecture of shards of flesh- or brick-coloured painting; planes that have been started and stopped, as if in a slow-motion exaggerated cartoon of the movement a painter makes between looking up, recording on canvas the detail he sees, looking back. The process of painting reveals itself with a gross, physical explicitness, and in doing so, creates a kind of caricature; Picasso monstrously transfigures the aspect of Vollard's head, its massive dome, that most impresses him.

There is not a single aspect of his face that is "there" in any conventional pictorial sense. The more you look for a picture, the more insidiously Picasso demonstrates that life is not made of pictures but of unstable relationships between artist and model, viewer and painting, self and world. And yet this is a portrait of an individual whose presence fills the painting. Vollard is more real than his surroundings, which have disintegrated into a black and grey crystalline shroud.

As a portrait it is flattering, not least in its implication that Vollard is one of a tiny elite who understand cubism (that huge brain of his must have helped). With eyes closed like a tranquil, omnipotent god, Vollard is sublime.

Inspirations and influences: Picasso said: "The most beautiful woman who ever lived never had her portrait painted, drawn or engraved any oftener than Vollard - by Cézanne, Renoir, Rouault, Bonnard... But my cubist portrait of him is the best one of all."

Where is it? Pushkin Museum of Fine Art, Moscow.

Picasso's Portrait of Gertrude Stein


The Laundry Barge
In 1904, Picasso returned to Paris and rented a studio in an old, dilapidated building filled with artists and poets. Located at 13 Rue Ravignan, the building was dubbed the Bateau-Lavoir (or laundry barge) by poet-in-residence, Max Jacob. It is at this time that Picasso first came into contact with French painter Henri Matisse, as well as American ex-pat Gertrude Stein, who—along with her brother Leo—was one of the foremost patrons of modern art in Paris. The "Bateau-Lavoir"

Gertrude and Picasso
In 1905, at the same time that Leo Stein bought Matisse's Bonheur de Vivre, Gertrude commissioned a portrait by Picasso. The related story goes like this: Stein sat for Picasso so many times (supposedly 90 sittings) that eventually he said that he could no longer see her face when he looked at her. He then wiped out the face just before a trip to Spain.

In the autumn of 1905 after his return to Paris, Picasso painted Stein's mask-like face, which reflected his new interest in archaic Iberian sculpture that he had just seen in an exhibition at the Louvre. There is one more element to this anecdote: Stein's friends often noted that the painting didn't look like her. Picasso's response was, "it will." For her part, Stein said in later years that it was the only image of her that she thought was successful.

Self-Portrait (1907) picasso

Picasso’s revelation of himself to us shows how his upbringing and relationships led him to suppress emotions and unwanted knowledge from himself subconciously. As Gedo said, Picasso was “veiling the confessional aspects of his painting.” (Gedo, 80) Although Picasso had no yet found what he was “veiling”, he could not find it himself because of his need to put negative memories in the past. Picasso did not realize that this is what he needed to help him put together what made him human, and his attempts were futile.
In a final attempt to find himself, and in the era of Cubism, Picasso painted his eyes with the most definition in Self-Portrait (1907). With his eyes the darkest, most defined, and largest they had ever been, he was more blind than ever about how to go about finding himself, and exactly what components made up his personality. In this typically Cubist painting, there was no doubt that Picasso believed he had finally succeeded in discovering who he truly was. While some people were opposed to his new style, there were many who praised him. In Self-Portrait (1907), Picasso’s eyes are large and set, making his “face…severe and masklike.” (Wertenbaker, 53) This feature of a “mask” of ego hides Picasso from himself, and although his eyes are large, everything else is covered. Picasso tried to go back to the basics of artistic technique in this last desperate attempt to discvoer himself. As Wertenbaker says, there are “characteristics of primitive art in his portrayals of the human face and figure.” (Wertenbaker, 53) However, these “primitive” characteristics do not help Picasso remove everything that is clouding his view of himself. They merely help us see all the more clearly why Picasso will always be blinded by his ego. His over-confidence and beleif that he is the only success in his field will always blind him from seeing the truth about himself and his shattered personality.
Picasso, Pablo. Self-portrait (1907) National Gallery, Prague, Czech Republic.

Self-Portrait with Palette (1906) picasso


Self-Portrait with Palette, 1906

Picasso's preparatory drawings for this striking self-portrait of 1906 indicate that the composition went through considerable transformation. At one point, Picasso considered portraying himself in the act of painting, his gaze focused on touching brush to palette. But the final painting shows the artist staring outward, holding only a palette, his right hand clenched in a fist. Even more than the crude shirt he wears, it is the artist's broad, sharply chiseled face that conveys an impression of raw creativity. The stylized facial features, especially the large almond-shaped eyes, derive from Picasso's recent study of ancient sculpture from the Iberian Peninsula-now occupied by Spain and Portugal.

Yo Picasso (1901) picasso

The great Spanish painter Pablo Picasso created his self portrait Yo, Picasso in 1901. The painting is a description of the artist's self features created brilliantly in different poses.
Pablo Picasso:

Pablo Ruiz Picasso was a great Spanish painter and sculptor. Picasso was one of the famous art figures of 20th century. Pablo Picasso's artworks are divided according to the periods (mentioned below) of which they are influenced.






  • The Blue Period (1901-1904) most famous period

  • Rose Period (1905-1907)

  • The African-influenced Period (1908-1909)

  • Analytic Cubism (1909-1912) and

  • Synthetic Cubism (1912-1919)


    Yo, Picasso, Description:

    Yo, Picasso is a translated version of "I Picasso". Pablo Picasso created Yo, Picasso in the year 1901; the same year when he was suffering with the shock of death of his close friend, Carlos Casagemas. Picasso created two different versions of this painting as "Yo Picasso" and "Yo." The title of the painting clearly reveals Picasso's agitated mental condition and how self conscious Picasso had become during that miserable period of his life.

    In the painting Picasso is depicted looking in a sideways glance. Critics analyze that a look on the painting clears out the egoist expression in Picasso's eyes. According to Daix the expression in Picasso's eyes is really extraordinary. "Yo Picasso" has a slightly smiling expression. It shows Picasso with a brilliant facial expression making him appear twenty years old. This was Picasso's own vision about himself. He had painted it during his famous Blue Period. Still, the "portrait" of "Yo Picasso" reveals the truth for a viewer who is determining Picasso's inner soul, but at the same time it proves a failure for Picasso himself discovering the truth of his own existence.

    Yo, Picasso, Auction:

    Yo, Picasso was one of most expensive paintings by Picasso. The painting which was created in 1901 was auctioned in the year 1989 by Wendell Cherry in Sotheby's New York. Stavros Niarchos paid a huge amount of $79.3 millions for that painting.

  • The Old Guitarist Pablo Picasso


    The Old Guitarist
    Pablo Picasso
    Oil On Panel, 1903

    When the subject of monochromatic color schemes comes up, I think of Picasso and his “Blue Period”. I also think of this particlular painting, a prime example of that period, as it has been a great favorite of mine since I was a child.

    Many years ago, I visited the Art Institute in Chicago and for some reason, the fact that this painting is in residence there had slipped my mind. I came around a corner and there it was! It’s a good thing there happened to be a bench right in front of it, because its power literally knocked me off my feet. I still get a shiver just thinking about it.

    Pablo Picasso’s father was an art instructor, so he was trained as an artist as a very young man. Having outgrown his possibilities in Madrid (Spain) by the age of 19, he went to live in Paris where he was a small fish in a larger pond and had to struggle to figure where he fit into the society of artists there. Because he identified with those living on the fringes of society, he began to paint pictures of the downtrodden, depicting them in all of their misery, using a muted palette of blue - the color of melancholy. His sadness during this period was intensified by the suicide of a young friend. This became known as his “Blue Period” (1901-1904), one of two very prolific periods that were preambles to “Cubism”. Les miserables of the Blue Period gave way to the the clowns and other circus figures of the “Rose Period” (1904-1906), a much more cheerful body of work over all. After that, beginning with his experiments in Cubism, Picasso became a power to be reckoned with in the world of modern art and continued to be an innovator of the highest order for the rest of his life. This will not be the last we hear of him in our “Legacy” section. And, whenever I think of this painting, it reminds me of a favorite poem that seems to go with it so well.

    Some have said that Wallace Stevens wrote “The Man With the Blue Guitar” after viewing Picasso’s “Old Guitarist” and it certainly seems as if it could be so.

    I reprint the whole text of the poem here although, honestly, I find it a bit disconcerting and difficult to stay with (it’s ok to admit these things). But the first six lines, which I highlighted with bold blue type, say it all, in my opinion. I have framed them on my studio wall to remind me that it is not always necessary to go by the book - that my art is my “blue guitar”, and through it, I can redefine my world to match my fancy.

    Picasso’s Still Life with Chair Caning, 1912 (Musee Picasso, Paris)


    My fortune cookie today was uncanny, “Old associates lead to new adventures.” It was discarded after a lunch celebrating a terrific collaborative effort between myself, Eric Feinblatt and Beth Harris. We met together just an hour or so prior to our scheduled presentation in FIT’s CET (Center for Excellence in Teaching – our technology lab for faculty development). We were scheduled to discuss uses of multimedia in teaching and we were prepared to discuss exploratory work we had done using a variety of tools in the context of our own courses. These tools include Flickr, podcasting (using Audacity), and some preliminary work done with Camtasia. But Beth, in a flash of brilliance, suggested that we combine Camtasia with ARTstor’s OIV (offline image viewer) to move beyond the podcasts we’d already created at the Metropolitan Museum of Art for our online courses. We quickly settled on Picasso’s Still Life with Chair Caning as our initial victim. This, because I will soon be covering it in my online course, and I have found this collage especially difficult to adequately convey to my students. In our podcasts, Beth and I had stood before a painting in the museum, IPod with mic attachment in hand, and offered our students a spontaneous conversation about the work of art. What resulted was an unscripted discussion with a wonderful sense of discovery as each of us prompted the other to look anew.

    So the three of us sat down and we were now able to go significantly further than we’d been able to in the museum. Thanks to the OIV, some forethought, and Google, we were able to significantly reinforce our discussion with collateral images. Further we were able to zoom in and record our mouse movements–used largely as a pointer. This is an important advantage over simply placing descriptive text near the image and hoping the student can connect the two. The result, like with the podcasts, was an easy give and take that was meant to model for our students, the ways they might begin to freely explore works of art.

    As the three of us went to lunch after the presentation, we mused that if we created a Camtasia file with subsidiary documentary material, our students or anyone with a video IPod could stand in front of a painting in a museum and not only hear our analysis but also see sketches, variations and other supporting materials, truly creating a classroom without walls.

    femme assise dans un jardin picasso

    A painting is an art of creating illustration of different types. The concept of painting is not new in fact it has emerged since the ancient cave paintings. The oldest known paintings are at the Grotte Chauvet in France, claimed by some historians to be about 32,000 years old. Such paintings were engraved and painted using red ochre. The images of show horses, rhinoceros, lions, buffalo, mammoth or humans were often painted in hunting activities. cave paintings were created all over the world including France, Spain, Portugal, China, Australia, India and many other countries of the world. Painting grew slowly in different forms while previously only charcoals and other such things were used for creating a sketch. With the introduction of colors great changes have come in painting forms. Many paintings were created from time to time by many famous artists Femme assise dans un jardin is one such painting created by Pablo Picasso in 1938.


    The Painting (Femme Assise Dans Un Jardin):

    Femme assise dans un jardin is an exotic painting created by Pablo Picasso in 1938 on a canvas sized 131 X 97 cm. Like other paintings this extensive oil painting work became popular worldwide. The painting depicts a female figure.

    The Artist (Pablo Picasso):

    Pablo Picasso was a famous Spanish artist. Throughout his art life he did many paintings and made mark in the world of art. One such painting is Femme assise dans un jardin. Picasso's full name was Pablo Diego José Francisco de Paula Juan Nepomuceno María de los Remedios Cipriano de la Santísima Trinidad Clito Ruiz y Picasso. Picasso was one of the famous art figures in 20th century art. Generally Picasso's artworks are divided into different periods. The most famous period of his work is the Blue period (1901-1904), the Rose Period (1905-1907), the African-influenced Period (1908-1909), Analytic Cubism (1909-1912), and Synthetic Cubism (1912-1919).

    Femme Assise Dans Un Jardin Auction:

    Femme assise dans un jardin created by Pablo Picasso in 1938 went for auction in 1999. The painting was auctioned by Robert Saidenberg in Sotheby's, New York. The painting was sold for $49,502,500.

    Les Noces de Pierrette picasso

    One of the most important 20th century art personality Pablo Picasso created Les Noces de Pierrette in 1905. Picasso created many expensive paintings Les Noces de Pierrette is one such masterpiece.
    Pablo Picasso, the Artist:

    Picasso was an important Spanish painter and sculptor in the 20th century art era. The Spanish artist has a rather long name as Pablo Diego José Francisco de Paula Juan Nepomuceno María de los Remedios Cipriano de la Santísima Trinidad Clito Ruiz y Picasso. Picasso studied art in Madrid. Picasso's artworks are usually classified into different periods. Picasso never followed the traditional art style. He always wanted to create something new. Hence, in 1950 changing his art style once again he reinterpreted many great masters' artworks such as on Velazquez's painting of Las Meninas. Picasso created a series of works. He also created some work based on the paintings of Goya, Poussin, Manet, Courbet and Delacroix.


    Les Noces De Pierrette, Description:

    The Les Noces De Pierrette was created in 1905. The painting clearly reveals the impact of Picasso's Blue Period as it was created between 1901 and 1904. It is a very somber painting created brilliantly, applying shades of blue and green, reflecting the somber mood. Picasso created the painting during the most critical period of his life; when he was suffering of continuous depression from the death of his dear friend Carlos Casagemas. The brilliant painting is the last in the list of Picasso's Japanese themed paintings. The painting is considered as a blue period masterpiece. No doubt the painting is a great artwork and masterpiece in all respects. The painting perfectly combines all the magic, mystery and melancholy of Picasso's Blue period.

    Les Noces De Pierrette, Auction:

    Les Noces De Pierrette was auctioned on 30th November, 1989 at Binoche et Godeau in Paris, France. It was sold to an Asian businessman for a huge amount of $51,670,000 setting a record of being one of the most expensive paintings of world.

    Femme aux Bras Croises picasso


    Femme aux Bras Croisés was created by Pablo Picasso in 1902. This painting was created in the most famous Blue period, a major stage in the painting career of Picasso.
     
    Femme aux Bras Croisés, Analysis:

    One of the famous art figures in the 20th century art era, Pablo Picasso was born in Spain and was a great child prodigy. Picasso's artworks are often categorized in different periods including Blue period, Rose period, Analytic Cubism, and Synthetic Cubism. During his long art life Picasso gave expression to many of his finest creations. One such creation is the famous painting of Femme aux Bras Croisés, painted in 1901. The brilliant artwork formed a major part of Picasso's famous Blue Period; A dark, sad time in the artist's life. In Femme aux Bras Croisés, Picasso has portrayed Marie-Therese Walter on a canvas of dimension 60 cm x 81 cm.



    The beautiful painting falls in the blue period of Picasso when Picasso used to create characteristically all his paintings by combining many different tones of blue. In this beautiful oil painting Femme aux Bras Croisés, Picasso portrayed a woman believed to be Marie-Thérèse Walter sitting with her arms crossed and staring at the endless nothing, at a void. Picasso started exploring his particular work in 1901 and came to an end in 1902. Femme aux Bras Croisés was an oil work on a lithographic background. Many of Picasso's creations are regarded most expensive. Similarly, Femme aux Bras Croisés is also one of most expensive paintings created by Picasso. Because of its excellent combination of colors and idea the painting attracted many potential buyers.

    Femme aux Bras Croisés, Auction:

    One of the most expensive paintings, Femme aux Bras Croisés, was auctioned in the year 2000. Just after its creation the painting was bought by Gertrude Stein from Picasso. Later on, the painting was taken over by McCormick family who organized an auction at Christie's Rockefeller in New York City and sold Femme aux Bras Croisés for $55,000,000 on November 8, 2000. The price of the painting made it as one of the most expensive paintings ever sold in an auction.

    Rideau, Cruchon et Compotie picasso



    Rideau, Cruchon ET Compotier was created about 1893 to 1894 by French artist Paul Cezanne. The painting is considered as the most expensive painting based on still life theme.

    Rideau, Cruchon ET Compotier Analysis:

    Paul Cezanne was a great post impressionist French artist. It is believed that Cezanne's artworks laid the foundation of the alteration to move from the 19th century traditional art world to 20th century new style of work. Thus, Cezanne formed a bridge between the late 19th century Impressionism and the early 20th century's new artistic world, Cubism. In all his artworks Cezanne establishes his great command over color, design, composition and draftsmanship of art.



    One special characteristic of Paul Cezanne is that he is an expert in using rhythmic, susceptible and exploratory brushstrokes in all his artworks. Another common trait is the artist's excellence in using small brushstrokes and simple colors. Cezanne's paintings reveal the artist's nature of thoroughly studying a subject before actually portraying it. Paul Cezanne was especially popular for drawing still lifes. One such still life work is Rideau Cruchon ET Compotier created by Paul Cezanne in about 1893 to 1894. Rideau, Cruchon ET Compotier is considered as the most expensive painting based on still life theme ever sold in an auction. This painting of Cezanne expresses the complex emotions of the artists even being based upon core realities of life. Such paintings are said to lead the creation of new art styles during 20th century like the Cubism of Picasso.

    Rideau, Cruchon ET Compotier Auction:

    This expensive painting has a long history of moving through hands of different potential art lovers such as Paris dealer Cornelis Hoogendijk, Ambroise Vollard, Dr Albert C. Barnes, Paul Rosenberg, and the Carroll Carstairs Gallery. Finally on May 10 1999, at Sotheby's, New York Rideau, Cruchon ET Compotier was sold in an auction for $60,502,500, establishing a record of first still life painting to be sold for such a high amount. However, later on the painting was resold at a loss.

    portrait de l'artiste sans barbe picasso

    7. Portrait de l'Artiste sans Barbe by Vincent van Gogh ($71,500,000)

    Portrait de l'artiste sans barbe ("Self-portrait without beard") is one of many self-portraits by Dutch painter Vincent van Gogh. He painted this one in Saint-Rémy-de-Provence, France in September 1889. The painting is a oil painting on canvas and is 40 cm x 31 cm (16" x 13").

    This is an uncommon painting since his other self-portraits show him with a beard. The self-portrait became one of the most expensive paintings of all time when it was sold for $71.5 million in 1998 in New York

    The Massacre of the Innocents picasso


    The Massacre of the Innocents is an episode of infanticide by the King of Judea, Herod the Great, that appears in the Gospel of Matthew Matthew 2:16-18. The author, traditionally Matthew the Evangelist, reports that Herod ordered the execution of all young male children in the village of Bethlehem, so as to avoid the loss of his throne to a newborn King of the Jews whose birth had been announced to him by the Magi. The incident, like others in Matthew, is described as the fulfillment of a passage in the Old Testament read as prophecy, in this case a reading of Jeremiah: "Then was fulfilled that which was spoken through Jeremiah the prophet, saying, A voice was heard in Ramah, Weeping and great mourning, Rachel weeping for her children."
    The infants, known in the Church as the Holy Innocents, have been claimed as the first Christian martyrs. Traditional accounts number them at more than ten thousand, but more conservative estimates put their number in the low dozens.. Modern biographers of Herod mostly deny the event took place.

    Au Moulin de la Galette


    Renoir delighted in `the people's Paris', of which the Moulin de la Galette near the top of Montmartre was a characteristic place of entertainment, and his picture of the Sunday afternoon dance in its acacia-shaded courtyard is one of his happiest compositions. In still-rural Montmartre, the Moulin, called `de la Galette' from the pancake which was its speciality, had a local clientèle, especially of working girls and their young men together with a sprinkling of artists who, as Renoir did, enjoyed the spectacle and also found unprofessional models. The dapple of light is an Impressionist feature but Renoir after his bout of plein-air landscape at Argenteuil seems especially to have welcomed the opportunity to make human beings, and especially women, the main components of picture. As Manet had done in La Musique aux Tuileries he introduced a number of portraits.
    The girl in the striped dress in the middle foreground (as charming of any of Watteau's court ladies) was said to be Estelle, the sister of Renoir's model, Jeanne. Another of Renoir's models, Margot, is seen to the left dancing with the Cuban painter, Cardenas. At the foreground table at the right are the artist's friends, Frank Lamy, Norbert Goeneutte and Georges Rivière who in the short-lived publication L'Impressionniste extolled the Moulin de la Galette as a page of history, a precious monument of Parisian life depicted with rigorous exactness. Nobody before him had thought of capturing some aspect of daily life in a canvas of such large dimensions.
    Renoir painted two other versions of the subject, a small sketch now in the Ordrupgard Museum, near Copenhagen and a painting smaller than the Louvre version in the John Hay Whitney collection. It is a matter of some doubt whether the latter or the Louvre version was painted on the spot. Rivière refers to a large canvas being transported to the scene though it would seem obvious that so complete a work as the picture in the Louvre would in any case have been finished in the studio.

    Portrait du Dr. Gache picasso

     
    Portrait of Dr. Gachet is one of the most revered paintings by Dutch artist Vincent van Gogh. It depicts Dr. Paul Gachet, who took care of him during the final months of his life. It was the only portrait painted by van Gogh during his stay at the doctor's home in Auvers-sur-Oise (27.2 km outside Paris), a 70 day period from May to July 1890. In 1990, it fetched a then-record price of $82.5 million ($75 million, plus a 10 percent buyer's commission) when sold at auction in New York.
    There are two authenticated versions of the portrait, both painted in June 1890 at Auvers. Both show Doctor Gachet sitting at a table and leaning his head onto his right arm, but they are easily differentiated in color and style.
    In 1890, Van Gogh's brother Theo was searching for a home for the artist upon his release from the hospital at Saint-Rémy. Upon the recommendation of Camille Pissarro, former patient of the doctor who told Theo of Gachet's interests in working with artists, Theo sent Vincent to Gachet's second home in Auvers.
    Vincent Van Gogh's impression of Gachet at times was unfavorable, writing to Theo: "I think that we must not count on Dr. Gachet at all. First of all, he is sicker than I am, I think, or shall we say just as much, so that's that. Now when one blind man leads another blind man, don't they both fall into the ditch?"[3] However, a letter dated two days later to their sister Wilhelmina, he relayed, "I have found a true friend in Dr. Gachet, something like another brother, so much do we resemble each other physically and also mentally." It is perhaps with this affection van Gogh decided to paint his doctor's portrait.

    Van Gogh's thoughts returned several times to the painting by Eugène Delacroix of Torquato Tasso in the madhouse. After a visit with Paul Gauguin to Montpellier to see Alfred Bruyas's collection in the Musée Fabre, Van Gogh wrote to Theo, asking if he could find a copy of the lithograph after the painting. Three and a half months earlier, he had been thinking of the painting as an example of the sort of portraits he wanted to paint: "But it would be more in harmony with what Eugène Delacroix attempted and brought off in his Tasso in Prison, and many other pictures, representing a real man. Ah! portraiture, portraiture with the thought, the soul of the model in it, that is what I think must come."
    Van Gogh wrote to his brother in 1890 about the painting:
    “     I've done the portrait of M. Gachet with a melancholy expression, which might well seem like a grimace to those who see it... Sad but gentle, yet clear and intelligent, that is how many portraits ought to be done... There are modern heads that may be looked at for a long time, and that may perhaps be looked back on with longing a hundred years later.

    Boy with a Pipe Picasso


     This paintings was painted in 1907. It was called the most innovative painting since the work of Giotto, when Les Demoiselles d'Avignon first appeared it was as if the art world had collapsed. Known form and respresnetation were completely abandon. The reductionism and contortion of space in the painiting was incredible, and dislocation of faces explosive. Like any revolution, the shock waves reverbetrated and the inevitable outcome was Cubism.

    This large work, which took nine months to complete, exposes the true genius and novelty of Picasso's passion. Suddenly he found freedom of expression away from current and classical French influences and was able to carve his own path.

    Picasso created hundreds of sketches and studies in preparation for the final work. It was painted in Paris during the summer of 1907. Demoiselles was revolutionary and controversial, and led to anger and disagreement amongst his closest associates and friends. Picasso long acknowledged the importance of Spanish art and Iberian sculpture as influences on the painting. Demoiselles is believed by critics to be influenced by African tribal masks and the art of Oceania, although Picasso denied the connection; many art historians remain skeptical about his denials. Several experts maintain that, at the very least, Picasso visited the Musée d'Ethnographie du Trocadéro in the spring of 1907 where he saw and was unconsciously influenced by African and Tribal art several months before completing Demoiselles. Some critics argue that the painting was a reaction to Henri Matisse's Le bonheur de vivre and Blue Nude.

    Picasso drew each figure differently. The woman pulling the curtain on the far right has heavy paint application throughout. Her head is the most cubist of all five, featuring sharp geometric shapes. The cubist head of the crouching figure underwent at least two revisions from an Iberian figure to its current state.

    Much of the critical debate that has taken place over the years centers on attempting to account for this multiplicity of styles within the work. The dominant understanding for over five decades, espoused most notably by Alfred Barr, the first director of the Museum of Modern Art in New York City and organizer of major career retrospectives for the artist, has been that it can be interpreted as evidence of a transitional period in Picasso's art, an effort to connect his earlier work to Cubism, the style he would help invent and develop over the next five or six years.

    The Museum of Modern Art in New York City mounted an important Picasso exhibition on November 15, 1939 that remained on view until January 7, 1940. The exhibition entitled: Picasso:40 Years of His Art, was organized by Alfred H. Barr (1902–1981), in collaboration with the Art Institute of Chicago. The exhibition contained 344 works, including the major and then newly painted Guernica and its studies, as well as Les Demoiselles.

    Maya with Doll


    Maya with Doll (Maya a la Poupee) is an oil painting by Pablo Picasso. Created in 1938, the New York Times described it as "a colorful Cubist portrait of Picasso’s daughter as a child clutching a doll."
     2007 theft and recovery

    On February 28, 2007, the painting was one of two stolen from the home of Picasso's granddaughter Diana Widmaier-Picasso.  The other was a 1961 painting of his second wife, titled Jacqueline.

    On August 7, 2007, French officials announced that the painting had been recovered, along with the other stolen painting, "Jacqueline". The paintings were found in Paris and the thieves, who were known to the police for previous cases of art theft, were arrested.

    Guernica Picasso

    In 1937 the Spain was at war; a civil war between the Republic Government and Francisco Franco’s Francoist army. Franco led a rebellion army to overturn the government and bring communism to the Spanish people. The Francoist army had the support of Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. On April 26, 1937, 24 planes bombed the Basque town of Guernica. The town held no military significants, the objective; to send a message.

    This tragedy effected many people including Picasso, and with a commissioning by the Spanish Republican government, Picasso set to work on a mural which would become his most famous piece of work. The painting, Guernica, broke Picasso out of a creative drought and renewed a passion, but now he did not want to be known as an icon breaker. Now, he set to work to create an icon.
    The painting was 11 x 25.6 feet reflects the devastating effect of the bombing.   while early sketches showed images of hope and optimism, this faded and we are left with this powerful painting. We can pull a lot of meaning from this painting and many spend time analysing it. Like the ever-seeing eye; the focus of everyone’s gaze and could be a symbol of evil or the bombers, the light bulb in the eye symbolising the devastating effect of technology or maybe it’s there because the Spanish word for light bulb is “bombilla”, which makes an allusion to “bomb”. Some symbols in the painting may be easier to recognise, like the open palm of the dead soldier is a stigmata, a symbol of martyrdom. No matter what you see in the painting, it truly is a masterpiece that stirs up a lot of emotion.
    I would love to hear what you see and think of the painting but I would like to leave you with a story I’ve heard about Picasso, the painting, during World War 2.
    During the 1940’s Picasso’s studio on the rue des Grands-Augustins was often visited by German officers. On one of their raids a Gestapo officer found a postcard of “Guernica,” Picasso’s 1937 lament for the Basque town bombed by the Luftwaffe.
    “Did you do this?” asked the German.
    “No, you did!” replied Picasso.  “Take it? Souvenir”

    Buste de Françoise

     Lot Description

    Pablo Picasso (1881-1973)
    Buste de Françoise
    oil on board
    39¼ x 31¾ in. (99.6 x 80.6 cm.)
    Painted in 1946

    Special Notice

    VAT rate of 5% is payable on hammer price and at 20% on the buyer's premium.

    Provenance

    Maya Widmaier-Picasso, Paris.
    Acquired by the late Ernst Beyeler, Basel, by 1997.
    Saleroom Notice
    Claude Picasso has confirmed the authenticity of this work.
    Pre-Lot Text
    PROPERTY FROM THE ESTATE OF ERNST BEYELER
    Literature
    The Picasso Project, ed., Picasso's Paintings, Watercolors, Drawings and Sculpture: Liberation and Post-War Years, 1944-1949, San Francisco, 2000, no. 46-059c, p. 78 (illustrated).
    Exhibited
    New York, Museum of Modern Art, Picasso and Portraiture, April - September 1996, p. 425 (illustrated); this exhibition later travelled to Paris, Grand Palais, October 1996 - January 1997.
    Saarbrücken, Saarlandmuseum, Pablo Picasso - die Malerei de fünfziger Jahre, November 2007 - February 2008.

    Lot Notes

    During the mid-1940s, while Paris was still under the burden of the Occupation, Pablo Picasso began a relationship with a young woman, Françoise Gilot, an artist in her own right. This would bring about an incredible, joyous liberation in his work. Painted in 1946, just after the end of the Second World War, Buste de Françoise is filled with a sense of celebration. The intense, rich colours and the sensuous flowing curves with which Picasso has so caressingly depicted Françoise's body and face speak of new-found freedoms, both with her and with the world at large. After the austerity of so much of Picasso's wartime output, for instance his melancholy, angular still life compositions and his tormented images of his lover Dora Maar, the lyrical, sensual form of Françoise made a bright, marked contrast. Looking at Buste de Françoise, the precedent of Marie-Thérèse Walter comes to mind, as the arcing forms which delineate Picasso's lover's body have been rendered with a similar sense of visual poetry. The intense palette and looping forms recall, say, Le rêve, Picasso's iconic image of Marie-Thérèse from just over a decade earlier. This is an effect that is heightened by his stained glass-like use of outlines to thrust the colour fields into more intense relief. However, where Marie-Thérèse was often shown asleep, Françoise has about her an intense vitality that is increased by Picasso's focus on her direct gaze, captured through the blue and red dots of her pupils.

    Picasso had met Françoise several years before the present work was painted, when she had been eating with a friend and another mutual acquaintance in a restaurant in Paris. Picasso, who had been dining with Dora Maar, had clearly been intrigued by the two young women sitting with his friend and engineered an introduction. When he asked about them, and the two girls explained that they were artists, Picasso replied: 'Well... I'm a painter too. You must come to my studio and see some of my paintings' (F. Gilot & C. Lake, Life with Picasso, New York, Toronto & London, 1964, p. 15). Françoise became a frequent visitor to Picasso's studio on the rue des Grands-Augustins, and soon was the artist's lover.

    With its green hair and blue face, Buste de Françoise clearly relates to an episode that was to have a huge impact on Françoise. It was in 1946, while she and Picasso were in the South of France, that the Spanish painter suggested that they make a trip to visit his friend Henri Matisse, who was living nearby. Françoise, a painter in her own right, who loved Matisse's work, jumped at the chance; while there, she bore witness to the conversations of these two titans of twentieth century painting and recorded them in some of her books in later years. One of the exchanges that would come to have an impact on Françoise's life occurred when Matisse began to say that he liked the idea of painting her portrait: 'He at once stated that he might very well make a portrait of me, in which my hair would be olive green, my complexion light blue, and in which of course he would not forget the angle of my eyebrows in relation to my nose' (F. Gilot, Matisse and Picasso: A Friendship in Art, London, 1990, p. 23). Elsewhere, she recalled the exchange between Matisse and Picasso. Once Matisse had explained that, 'if I made a portrait of Françoise, I would make her hair green,' Picasso retorted:

    '"But why would you make a portrait of her?"
    '"Because she has a head that interests me," Matisse said, "with her eyebrows sticking up like circumflex accents."
    '[...] Up to that time Pablo had painted only two small gray-and-white portraits of me, but when he got back into the car, all of a sudden a proprietary instinct took possession of him.
    '"Really, that's going pretty far," he said. "Do I make portraits of Lydia?' I said I didn't see any connection between the two things. "In any case," he said, "now I know how I should make your portrait"' (Gilot & Lake, op. cit., 1964, pp. 99-100).

    Picasso's jealousy of Matisse's suggestion, which itself reflects the proprietary nature of his portraits of the women in his life, resulted in his asking Françoise to move in with him shortly afterwards. This would be the beginning of a relationship which lasted into the 1950s and which also resulted in the birth of two of Picasso's children, Paloma and Claude.

    From an artistic point of view, Matisse's suggestion that he paint Françoise, a suggestion to which she doubtless would not have objected, resulted instead in a flurry of activity by Picasso. He began to look at her anew, creating a string of portraits. Some of these were works on paper in which he focussed entirely on her face, filled with the bloom of youth and her wide eyes; in others, he found that her breasts and entire air of fecundity pushed him towards depicting her as a flower, the Femme-fleur which features in two portraits painted only a little over a month before Buste de Françoise.

    When Picasso first observed his Femme-fleur rendering of Françoise, the rivalry that had helped to inspire the picture was clear, as he immediately declared, 'Matisse isn't the only one who can paint you with green hair' (Gilot & Lake, op.cit., 1964, p. 117). Although painted over a month after the Femme-fleur, looking at Buste de Françoise, the traces of her alter ego are clear. Picasso has shown her with the green hair which recalls foliage; indeed, the other colours are likewise reminiscent of flowers. At the same time, Picasso has depicted Françoise with an exaggeratedly slender waist, underscoring his own appreciation of her curvaceous figure and lending extra emphasis to her fulsome breasts while also reviving that concept of her body as a stem, as was the case in the Femme-fleur. Like those earlier pictures, Picasso has also placed a great focus on Françoise's facial features. While they are here presented as more angular than some of the earlier portraits, they nonetheless reveal an almost codified system of representation. The face appears to have been shown in a post-Cubist manner as though seen from several angles - the ears are shown at each end of the elliptical head which appears to have been unfolded, becoming two profiles. The eyes, nose, mouth and chin have become ciphers on the arena of her face, recalling ancient Egyptian art and indeed the 'Eye of Horus' amulets which would later reverberate through Picasso's portraits of his second wife, Jacqueline.

    Looking at Buste de Françoise, it also becomes apparent that Matisse's words were still on Picasso's mind, as he has indeed rendered her with 'olive green' hair and 'light blue' complexion. In a way, both the sense of celebratory sensuality and the ardent, vivid palette of Buste de Françoise can be seen to echo Matisse's works, for instance his celebrated (though then scandalous) 1905 portrait of his wife, nick named La raie verte because of the bold green area that depicted a shadow on her face. It also relates to Matisse's more recent works such as Asia, a boldly-coloured image of erotic languor and glamour painted the same year as Buste de Françoise and now in the Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth.

    Matisse and Picasso had been regarded as rivals for much of their lives and careers, even in the first decades of the twentieth century. Later, this rivalry evolved into friendship. Amazingly, Picasso, who seldom paid glowing tribute to his contemporaries, admitted that, 'No one has ever looked at Matisse's painting more carefully than I; and no one has looked at mine more carefully than he' (Picasso, quoted in J. Golding, 'Introduction', pp. 13-24, Cowling et al., ed., Matisse Picasso, exh. cat., London, 2002, p. 13). Likewise, Matisse was candid when he said, 'Only one person has the right to criticise me: Picasso' (Matisse, quoted ibid., p. 24). It was during the period that Picasso was with Françoise that he and Matisse became closer. The shift in their relationship was eagerly documented by Françoise, an enthusiastic witness to their conversations. The esteem in which each artist held the other was vast, although this did not stop them sometimes needling each other, as may well have been the case when Matisse voiced his interest in painting Françoise. Yet it is clearly in part as a tribute to the older artist that he created Buste de Françoise, taking his rival's description as a list of constituent parts which he himself has co-opted in his own style to create something that, while perhaps inspired by Matisse, is nonetheless definitively Picasso.

    Femme assise, robe bleue picasso

     

    Lot Description

    Pablo Picasso (1881-1973)
    Femme assise, robe bleue
    signed and dated 'Picasso 25.10.39' (lower left)
    oil on canvas
    28¾ x 23½ in. (73 x 60 cm.)
    Painted on 25 October 1939

    Provenance

    Paul Rosenberg & Co., Paris & Bordeaux, by whom acquired directly from the artist.
    Confiscated in Bordeaux, 1940, and transferred to the German Embassy, Paris; transferred to the Jeu de Paume, 6th September 1941 (Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg inventory number PR 19); returned to the Möbel-Aktion and intended for transfer by train from Paris to the Nazi depot, Nikolsburg, Moravia, 1st August 1944.
    Seized by the French Resistance; restituted by the Commission de Récuperation to Paul Rosenberg.
    G. David Thompson, Pittsburgh, by whom acquired from the above; estate sale, Sotheby's Parke Bernet, New York, 23 & 24 March 1966, lot 68.
    Galerie Beyeler, Basel, by whom acquired at the above sale.
    Acquired from the above by the family of the present owner circa 1968, and thence by descent.
    Saleroom Notice
    Maya Widmaier-Picasso has confirmed the authenticity of this work.

    Claude Picasso has confirmed the authenticity of this work.
    Pre-Lot Text
    THE PROPERTY OF A LADY
    Exhibited
    Basel, Galerie Beyeler, Picasso, Works from 1932-1965, February - April 1967, no. 20 (illustrated).

    Lot Notes

    Claude Picasso has confirmed the authenticity of this work.


    Painted on 25 October 1939, Femme assise. Robe bleue is a searing portrait by Pablo Picasso of his lover Dora Maar. This picture, painted on the artist's birthday just after the beginning of the Second World War, is filled with the anxiety, distortions and tension that marks the greatest of Picasso's portraits of Dora; at the same time, there is a tender sensuality present in the organic, curvaceous forms of the face which provides some insight into their relationship. This picture was formerly owned by G. David Thompson, to whom the great curator and art historian Alfred H. Barr, Jr. referred as, 'one of the great collectors of the art of our time' (A.H. Barr, Jr., 'Foreword', auction catalogue, Parke-Bernet, New York, 1966, n.p.).

    When William Rubin curated an exhibition of Picasso and Portraiture at the Museum of Modern Art, New York in 1996, he divided Picasso's life and career by the various women who held sway, and sometimes indeed court, in the artist's life at any one time. This is a system that works remarkably well, despite the complications ensued because of the often overlapping status of the various women, as there were often stylistic sea-changes in Picasso's works. Dora Maar was one of Picasso's most important Muses; his pictures of her came, as did his relationship, in the latter years of his time with Marie-Thérèse Walter. There was a marked contrast between these two women: Marie-Thérèse had been young, blonde and athletic and was little interested in art; Picasso's time with her had resulted in flowing, sensual images. Dora was a marked contrast, as is demonstrated by Femme assise. Robe bleue: a complex, troubled character, intellectual and creative, a photographer and an artist in her own right, she was a form of peer for Picasso, having already been an established figure in Surreal circles by the time the pair were introduced. Picasso often presented Dora with her signature hats, conspicuous headwear that she often sported, a trait that may have begun during her days working on a campaign while she was a commercial photographer. Certainly in Femme assise. Robe bleue, the hat is present and correct, a striped purple confection with what appears to be a green feather or foliage of some sort, like the flowers present in some of the other pictures of her, jutting out at a rakish angle from the top.

    These hats often add a playful air to Picasso's paintings of Dora, yet this serves as a counterpoint to the rigours through which he often submitted her features, as is the case in the shifting, vulnerable flesh of Femme assise. Robe bleue. Although Picasso's early pictures of Dora focussed on her beauty and were lyrical, sometimes showing her as a mythical figure or leaning intimately while gazing at the painter, these works evolved within a short time to reveal a strain and an undercurrent of violence that reflected both the geopolitical situation in the run-up to the Second World War and also traits within her own personality. 'Dora, for me, was always a weeping woman,' Picasso told André Malraux, discussing his depictions of her. 'And it's important, because women are suffering machines... When I paint a woman in an armchair, the armchair implies old age or death, right? So, too bad for her' (Picasso to André Malraux, A. Malraux, Picasso's Mask, New York, 1976, p. 138). The morphing of Dora from lyrical inspiration to the vehicle for expressions of anxiety occurred quickly, as is demonstrated by the Femme en pleurs of 1937 formerly in Roland Penrose's collection and now owned by Tate, London. This was a change that continued throughout the years of conflict, and the remaining years of their relationship, as Picasso's depictions of Dora lurched from the juttingly angular to the smooth and back again. This is clear from the comparison of pictures such as the intimate portrait of Dora, already with a yellow face, now in the Musée Picasso, Paris, or the picture showing her in a chair in the same museum from the same year, featuring lively colours that are nonetheless reminiscent of bruising and enthroned within a chair that looks like a torture device, with those such as the painting now in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, in which Picasso's scrawling, sprawling brushwork appears itself to be the product of a violent energy. Intriguingly, a sensuous, almost sculptural appreciation of her face often returns, as is the case in Le chandail jaune, the 1939 painting in the Museum Berggruen in Berlin or indeed in the flowing eddies of yellow and grey in Femme assise. Robe bleue. Intriguingly, in both of these pictures, Picasso contrasts his treatment of the skin with that of the contrasing, elephantine hands.

    In Femme assise. Robe bleue, Dora has clearly suffered through her pictorial transformation. As Picasso himself explained, 'For years I've painted her in tortured forms, not through sadism, and not with pleasure either; just obeying a vision that forced itself on me. It was the deep reality, not the superficial one' (Picasso, quoted in B. Léal, '"For Charming Dora": Portraits of Dora Maar', pp. 384-407, Picasso and Portraiture: Representation and Transformation, London, 1996, p. 395). While some critics have linked the pictures of Dora specifically to the Spanish Civil War and the Second World War, it appears that Picasso, whose paintings often functioned as a barometer for his own state of mind, had found a Muse who was herself perfectly suited to his tense depictions of that period. It was both Dora's personality and a wider sense of unease at the situation in the world that Picasso managed to express in these bracing paintings.

    The violent dimension of Dora's character was already evident in Picasso's first legendary meeting with her, which has become the stuff of art historical myth. 'Pablo told me that one of the first times he saw Dora she was sitting at the Deux Magots,' Françoise Gilot would recount.

    'She was wearing black gloves with little pink flowers appliquéed on them. She took off the gloves and picked up a long, pointed knife, which she began to drive into the table between her outstretched fingers to see how close she could come to each finger without actually cutting herself. From time to time she missed by a tiny fraction of an inch and before she stopped playing with her knife, her hand was covered with blood. Pablo told me that was what made up his mind to interest himself in her. He was fascinated. He asked her to give him the gloves and he used to keep them in a vitrine at the Rue des Grands-Augustins, along with other mementos' (F. Gilot & C. Lake, Life with Picasso, New York, Toronto and London, 1964, pp. 85-86).
    Picasso was enthralled. This coup de foudre was a long way from his spontaneous meeting with Marie-Thérèse outside the Galeries Lafayette in Paris. Where that relationship had begun with the amour fou propounded by the Surrealists, in Dora, Picasso found a true Surrealist. Within a short time, the pair had embarked on an affair parallel to Picasso's relationship to Marie-Thérèse - indeed, at one point, the two contenders for his affections are reported to have demanded that he decide between them, resulting in a struggle. 'I liked them both, for different reasons,' Picasso himself explained.

    'Marie-Thérèse because she was sweet and gentle and did whatever I wanted her to, and Dora because she was intelligent. I decided I had no interest in making a decision. I was satisfied with things as they were. I told them they'd have to fight it out themselves. So they began to wrestle. It's one of my choicest memories' (Picasso, quoted in A. Stanissopoulos Huffington, Picasso: Creator and Destroyer, London, Sydney & Auckland, 1988, p. 234).

    Several people have pointed out the irony of this fight, orchestrated by the artist, taking place before Guernica, his 1937 lament at human conflict.

    Guernica itself owes much both to Dora and to Marie-Thérèse. It was against the backdrop of the Spanish Civil War that Picasso's images of Dora began to suffer their distortions, as she became the embodiment of his tensions, his pictures becoming expressionistic cries. During 1937, Dora was often presented crying, and increasingly the depictions featured transformations and striations that hinted at some form of heightened anxiety. Those same qualities are likewise evident in Femme assise. Robe bleue, which was painted shortly after the German invasion of Poland on 1 September 1939 and the ensuing declaration of war by Great Britain and France two days later. In this painting, violent distortions have resulted in the flesh of the face being dragged in unlikely directions, meaning that one eye is shown in profile and the other head-on; meanwhile, her hair and various garments feature fissure-like arcs that themselves give a sense of ratcheted-up tension. The gnarled, gigantesque hands have a skeletal feel and echo the furniture in the background. Meanwhile, the smiling mouth is a gaping, tooth-filled cavern, a carnivorous and threatening presence that prefigures, say, the monsters in Francis Bacon's 1944 triptych, Three Studies for Figures at the Base of a Crucifixion, now in Tate Britain, London.

    At the outbreak of the Second World War, Picasso had only just returned to Paris from Antibes, where he had spent the Summer. On 3 September, he fled Paris, fearing imminent bombardment, heading to Royan, on the coast near Bordeaux, in a car driven by his loyal chauffeur Marcel, with Dora, Jaime Sabartés and his wife and Picasso's pet dog Kazbek as fellow passengers. In Royan, Marie-Thérèse and Maya, her daughter with Picasso, were staying in a villa. Picasso now took rooms in the Hôtel du Tigre with Dora. Although he would return to Paris several times, once in search of papers to allow him to stay in Royan and once to retrieve some of his possessions and put others into storage while also buying painting supplies, he spent a large amount of the opening stages of the Second World War in Royan. While in January 1940, he would make arrangements to secure a studio space in a villa called Les Voiliers, until that point he was in relatively cramped circumstances. However, following his second journey to Paris, he did at least have access to better painting materials, some of which he had brought with him.

    Roland Penrose, who knew Picasso well, described the artist's quarters and life in Royan:

    'The rooms in which he lived for the next few months were cramped and badly lit. The town itself apart from its harbour had few attractions. Accepting the situation, however, he settled down to a regular routine in which the main factor, work, was punctuated with meals and walks around the town, accompanied by Dora Maar, Sabartès and the docile Kasbec' (Picasso, quoted in R. Penrose, Picasso: His Life and Work, London, 1958, p. 292).

    In fact, Picasso's life was made more complex during this period by the continued balancing act that he was performing between Dora and Marie-Thérèse, to whom he had explained away his separate rooms in the Hôtel du Tigre as a necessary studio. Perhaps it was the anxiety of his double life that helped to inform the tension of his depictions of Dora such as Femme assise. Robe bleue.

    Some months after Femme assise. Robe bleue was painted, when France entered the period of the Occupation, Picasso returned to Paris and eventually made his home, and a defiant stand, in the house on the rue des Grands-Augustins that he had recently taken. There, his status as a foreigner, as a Spaniard, allowed him certain liberties under the regime. He was able to continue working, although unable to exhibit his 'Degenerate Art'. However, like his friend and fellow artist Henri Matisse in the South of France, Picasso continued to work, and his presence served for some as a focal point, a sign of encouragement. He managed to avoid the moral entanglements in which some of his contemporaries were ensnared without fleeing, and his work, when finally exhibited in 1944 after the Liberation, appeared to embody both the spirit of resistance and also of relief as the end of the conflict approached. In the works that he created during the War, amongst them the intense portraits of Dora such as Femme assise. Robe bleue, Picasso had managed to condense some of the atmosphere that was felt by so much of the world, not least in Occupied France, into pictorial form. Picasso himself would later explain that he did not feel he had directly taken the War as a subject: 'I have not painted the war because I am not the kind of painter who goes out like a photographer for something to depict. But I have no doubt that the war is in these paintings I have done. Later on perhaps the historians will find them and show that my style has changed under the war's influence. Myself, I do not know' (Picasso, in Picasso and the War Years 1937-1945, ed. Steven. A. Nash, exh. cat., New York, 1998, p. 13). Certainly this has been the case: whether the viewer is looking at his still life compositions with skulls or his portraits of Dora with her distorted face, the war clearly appears obliquely and tangentially present.

    In the case of Femme assise. Robe bleue, the War was not only present in its subject matter, but also in its actual history. This picture belonged to Picasso's dealer, Paul Rosenberg, but was confiscated in 1940 and, later in the War, was intended to be transported to Germany when it was famously intercepted and captured by members of the French Resistance, an event immortalised, albeit in fictional form, in the 1966 movie The Train, starring Burt Lancaster and Jeanne Moreau. In real life, one of the people who helped to sabotage the National Socialists' attempt to remove countless artworks from France towards the end of the war was in fact Alexandre Rosenberg. The son of Paul Rosenberg, Alexandre had enlisted with the Free French Forces after the invasion of France in 1940.

    This picture was subsequently owned by the Pittsburgh steel magnate George David Thompson. During the course of his lifetime, Thompson accumulated an incredible collection, and many of the works that he formerly owned now grace the walls of museums in the United States, which were often the beneficiaries of his generous gifts, or of Europe. Indeed, through the agency of Ernst Beyeler, a group of 88 of Thompson's pictures by Paul Klee were acquired by the government of Nordrhein-Westfalen, which has its seat in Dusseldorf, and his collection of Giacometti's works came to form the backbone of the Stiftung Giacometti, now primarily based in Zurich but also in part in Basel and Winterthur. Thompson was a keen and avid collector who liked to see change within the works that he owned, sometimes carrying out exchanges rather than buying or selling for money. Thompson owned an astounding range of works by artists as varied as Giacomo Balla, Alberto Burri, Jean Dubuffet, Fernand Léger, Henri Matisse, Joan Miró, Jackson Pollock, as well as a number of Picasso's works including portraits of both Marie-Thérèse and others showing Dora Maar.